Project 2025 Actions Cite verifiedCite While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions. Select Citation Style MLA APA Chicago Manual of Style Copy Citation Share Share Share to social media Facebook X URL https://www.britannica.com/topic/Project-2025 Give Feedback Feedback Corrections? Updates? Omissions? Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login). Feedback Type Select a type (Required) Factual Correction Spelling/Grammar Correction Link Correction Additional Information Other Your Feedback Submit Feedback Thank you for your feedback Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

　　Print print Print Please select which sections you would like to print: Table Of Contents Cite verifiedCite While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions. Select Citation Style MLA APA Chicago Manual of Style Copy Citation Share Share Share to social media Facebook X URL https://www.britannica.com/topic/Project-2025 Feedback Also known as: 2025 Presidential Transition Project Written by Brian Duignan Brian Duignan is a senior editor at Encyclopædia Britannica. His subject areas include philosophy, law, social science, politics, political theory, and religion. Brian Duignan Fact-checked by The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree. They write new content and verify and edit content received from contributors. The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Last Updated: Jul 23, 2024 • Article History Table of Contents Also called: 2025 Presidential Transition Project (Show more)

　　Donald TrumpU.S. Pres. Donald Trump posing for his official portrait at the White House, Washington, D.C., October 6, 2017.(more)Project 2025 is a wide-ranging set of ultraconservative recommendations regarding U.S. government structure and policy as well as a plan of action for their immediate implementation should a Republican administration take power after the presidential election of 2024. Organized and promoted by the Heritage Foundation, a prominent and influential right-wing think tank, Project 2025 also incorporates a huge database of ideologically vetted candidates for political appointment to executive branch positions and a training program, called the Presidential Administration Academy, to enable potential appointees to operate successfully “from Day One of the next conservative Administration.”

　　Particularly in the creation of its structure and policy agenda, Project 2025 has involved contributions from dozens of conservative political organizations and numerous individual supporters of former president and 2024 Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, including some former Trump administration officials. (The director of Project 2025, Paul Dans, was himself the chief of staff of the Office of Personnel Management under President Trump.) Although the project does not explicitly identify itself as a program for a second Trump administration, it is widely understood as a blueprint that Trump may use to radically transform the federal government should he win the 2024 presidential election. Critics of the project have argued that the structural and policy changes it calls for would create an authoritarian and Christian nationalist state by massively expanding presidential power and aggressively promoting conservative Christian values. Even some conservatives have come to regard Project 2025 as a serious threat to democracy, the rule of law, civil rights, and the separation of church and state.

　　Read the official agenda of Project 2025.

　　Perhaps the most fundamental and far-reaching recommendation advanced in Project 2025 concerns the so-called “administrative” (or “deep”) state, the body of relatively independent administrative agencies that are empowered under federal law to create and enforce their own regulations—agencies whose leadership generally cannot be removed without cause, thereby preventing political interference in their operations. Conservatives have long characterized the administrative state as an antidemocratic federal bureaucracy intent on left-wing social engineering. Accordingly, one of the central goals of Project 2025 is to “dismantle the administrative state” by reinstating Schedule F, a Trump-era executive order that effectively enabled the classification of tens of thousands of career civil servants as political appointees, thus enabling their replacement with officers who would accept the conservative president’s direct control of their agencies. Project 2025 also calls for the immediate dismissal of the senior leadership of the State Department and a “top-to-bottom overhaul” of the Department of Justice, including the FBI, to eliminate the “critical core of personnel who are infatuated with the perpetuation of a radical liberal agenda.” During and after Trump’s presidency, the Department of Justice conducted investigations of the 2016 Trump presidential campaign’s alleged collusion with Russia, Trump’s attempt to overturn the presidential election of 2020, and his illegal removal of classified documents from the White House in 2021.

　　Project 2025 targets various other allegedly leftist agencies and departments. Its recommendations include abolishing the Department of Education, in part to prevent the perpetuation of “racist, anti-American, ahistorical propaganda” in public schools; dismantling the Department of Homeland Security and replacing it with a cabinet-level department dedicated to sealing the country’s southern border and deporting millions of undocumented immigrants; reforming the Department of Health and Human Services (and renaming it the “Department of Life”) to explicitly reject “the notion that abortion is health care”; reducing the regulatory authority of the Environmental Protection Agency; and breaking up the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), “one of the main drivers of the climate change alarm industry.”

　　While not explicitly endorsing Christian nationalism, Project 2025 shares the Christian nationalist views that “families comprised [sic] of a married mother, father, and their children are the foundation of a well-ordered nation and healthy society.” The Project calls upon the government to “maintain a biblically based, social science–reinforced definition of marriage and family” and contends that laws protecting the rights and freedoms of LGBTQ persons have effectively violated or at least disrespected the religious freedom of Christians. Christian nationalist values are reflected in the project’s recommendation that the religious convictions of employers and health care providers should permit them to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, among other factors, and that the government should “require that workers be paid time and a half for hours worked on the Sabbath.”

　　Key proposals Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content. Subscribe Now Project 2025 presents many other related and overlapping structural and policy recommendations involving a broad range of political and social issues. Some of these recommendations are listed below:

　　Institute a national ban on pornography. (“Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned.”)Reverse the approval, in 2000, of abortion pills by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).Enforce the 19th-century Comstock Act to prevent the mailing of abortion pills.End or scale back initiatives and regulations designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to expand the country’s reliance on renewable energy. (“The Department of Energy should end the…unprovoked war on fossil fuels, restore America’s energy independence, oppose eyesore windmills built at taxpayer expense, and respect the right of Americans to buy and drive cars of their own choosing.”)Withdraw the United States from international agreements on climate change, including the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Paris Agreement, and instead “promote investment in domestic energy, including oil and gas.”Weaken the Endangered Species Act by ending its use “to seize private property, prevent economic development, and interfere with the rights of states over their wildlife populations.”“Prohibit Planned Parenthood from receiving Medicaid funds” and “pass the Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act, which would accomplish the goal of defunding abortion providers such as Planned Parenthood.”Defend American civil society against “woke” culture warriors by deleting any “woke” language from “every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists.” (The language in question includes sexual orientation, gender identity, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), gender, gender equality, gender equity, gender awareness, gender-sensitive, abortion, reproductive health, reproductive rights, “and any other term used to deprive Americans of their First Amendment rights.”)Eliminate the practice of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in all federal agencies.Prohibit the federal government from using taxpayer dollars to fund critical race theory training.Work with Congress to amend Title IX—a 1972 federal law prohibiting sex-based discrimination in schools receiving federal funding—to define sex only as biological sex recognized at birth and not also as sexual orientation or gender identity.Work with Congress to execute radical tax reform in two stages. The first stage would involve reductions in corporate and capital gains tax rates, the simplification of income tax rates, and the elimination of most tax deductions and credits; the second stage would entail the replacement of income and corporate taxes with a consumption tax.